They Don't Want Month to Month... They Want To Feel Safe…
You've done their first lesson, explained the program, and the parent asks, "Can we just go month to month?"
When a parent asks that, it's usually not about billing. They're worried about making the wrong choice for their child, and month to month looks like an exit door.
Print the script below and run it in your next enrollment conference!
A lot of the time people put off a decision because they're anxious about getting it wrong (not because they've done the math). In one study, simply adding a second attractive option made more people put the whole decision off (Tversky & Shafir, 1992). When the choices feel hard to separate, the "no choice" option gets more popular (Dhar, 1997).
A parent at an enrollment conference is often in exactly that spot. They cannot know yet whether their child will love it, stick with it, or quit early. Month to month feels like a way to buy the program and still keep the decision open.
Losses also feel bigger than gains of the same size (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). The tuition they might "waste" feels bigger to them right then than what their child might gain. This is a form of negativity bias.
Negativity bias means bad things get more attention and carry more weight than good things of the same size. Across many kinds of studies, bad events, bad feedback and bad first impressions had a stronger and longer-lasting effect than good ones (Baumeister et al., 2001). When good and bad details are mixed together, people's overall judgment is often more negative than the details add up to (Rozin & Royzman, 2001). A parent can hear a lot of great things about the program and still go home thinking about what could go wrong.
Parents like flexibility. The big gyms advertise no contracts. Some owners figure that if they make it easy to leave, more families will say yes, and it's understandable.
In our sales framework, cancel anytime creates doubt, because it implies failure is likely. Lowering the price does the same thing, because it signals the first price was wrong. Neither one makes the parent feel safe. (For the full framework, see my article on the enrollment conversation.)
On to Practical Matters...
When I hear about a month-to-month fight at the close, I start earlier in the appointment.
Before anything the checklist is:
SECRET: Most of the time the above checklist is the issue. Other things:
The order matters. The term is always explained after they've paid the initial and first month but remember that’s not a surprise. It’s tied to the goal up front (a third of the way to Black Belt or whatever equivalent for yours that is about a year).
As an aside: This is for a longer discussion but understand when you’re asking someone to enroll (or buy) anything, we want to make it as simple as possible. What’s simpler: a page of numbers and months and months to train and maybe gear costs and more… or a page with just one or two numbers? The new student has to decide three things: is the initial payment ok? Is the monthly payment ok? Is the term ok? The best way to present when you get to money is to ask for the initial and first month, complete the transaction and the next step is the agreement. That way you're separating the decision so it's less confusing. Confused people don't buy.
We don't offer month-to-month or cancel-anytime, and we don't lower the price. When a family asks for that, they're usually nervous about making the wrong choice. We take the risk off them instead:
DON'T say: "Sure, we can do month to month if that makes you more comfortable."
SAY: "That's why we have a 30-day money-back guarantee."
Which one sounds safer to a nervous parent?
| Step | What the parent is feeling | Why the statement works |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Agree with the feeling | "I'll look foolish if this doesn't work." | The question gets the real concern out in the open, and "I definitely understand" lowers the tension before you answer it. |
| 2. Respond to the concern | "I can't know yet." | The parent gets a clear point (30 days) where they will know and you’re setting an expectation: “best thing you've ever done for your child”, so the uncertainty has an end date. |
| 3. Offer the guarantee | "What if I waste the money?" | A guarantee can signal quality. In one experiment, buyers read warranties as a sign of quality when the seller was credible (Boulding & Kirmani, 1993). Understand – this way they genuinely have ZERO risk. |
| 4. Respond again | "What if I'm stuck?" | The loss the parent is afraid of is zero for the first 30 days. |
Practice the script out loud with your staff before your next conference, until it sounds like you.
Offer the guarantee 5x minimum, and make sure both parents are there for the decision.
Five times can feel like a lot at first. A nervous parent often doesn't hear the guarantee the first time, because they're still running the worst case in their head.
I coached an owner who kept caving and offering trial memberships, and my advice was to offer the 30-day guarantee or a belt guarantee (by the first belt) at least five times. If you fold the first time, they didn’t really hear or understand the guarantee. You have to reiterate that your school is taking on the risk so they feel safe.
If you've done that, it doesn't mean you're bad at sales. A lot of owners who fold just hate feeling pushy. The script gives you something to say that is not pushy at all, because it's built around the parent's concern and helping them feel safe.
Both parents being there matters because family decisions are often shared, and who decides varies from one purchase to the next (Davis, 1976). The parent who wasn't there didn't see the child's face during the intro lesson. Get everyone in charge of finances, schedule, transportation and custody at the conference, and the "let me check with my spouse" objection goes away.
If they persist after all this (again most of the time you guys didn’t get this far), just let them know "It's OK. KarateBuilt Martial Arts isn't for everybody. We only work with families comfortable making a commitment to train and of course, as we discussed, have the intention to train to Black Belt and Beyond once accepted. Maybe it's not for you?"
It takes the pressure off, because you're no longer chasing the parent. You also have integrity by being serious about only working with people who are serious about training. It tells the family the program has standards. People tend to value something more when it's harder to get. In a classic study, the same cookie was rated more desirable when it came from a nearly empty jar than from a full one (Worchel et al., 1975)… which is a different psychology from Grand Theft Potato (that’s just fun to read).
Use it as the last step and only after the guarantee has been offered five times at a minimum. Some families will still walk, and that is fine, but you’re catching most of them because you helped them feel safe with the decision.
Here are three cases from school owners I've worked with.
| Situation | What happened | The fix |
|---|---|---|
| Agreements written with no term end date | They turned into month to month by default. The school lost about four thousand dollars in one month as families left when the weather changed. | Put a real term on every agreement BASED ON GOALS, then build the reasons families want to stay. |
| A hundred-dollar partial payment, no signed agreement | The family walked out with nothing signed, so there was no agreement to train. | Use the guarantee so they feel safe and the agreement gets signed at the point of sale. |
| About three hundred students, all month to month, at an old price | Lots of students, but they're paying an old rate. FILLED with Students and still can’t pay the bills. Every holiday season 30% stop paying and don’t come back in the new year. | Update the price, enroll new families based on a goal and renew the current students based on a goal. |
Month to month also costs the student. Kids want to quit when it gets hard, and that often happens before a habit is built. In one study of adults building a new daily habit, it took a median of 66 days for the habit to become automatic, with a range of 18 to 254 days (Lally et al., 2010).
Two more studies found similar numbers. Adults building a nutrition habit took a median of 59 days to reach peak automaticity (Keller et al., 2021). New gym members needed at least four workouts a week for about six weeks (42 days) to build an exercise habit (Kaushal & Rhodes, 2015). The three numbers average out to about 56 days. They measured slightly different things, and the gym members were training four times a week, so treat that as a rough guide.
That's what the agreement is for… not to take someone to court but to represent a goal. People often choose commitments on purpose because they know their future self may want to quit (Bryan et al., 2010). The term helps the family keep their child training through the months when they're most likely to quit.
Tom Hanks put it this way as Jimmy Dugan in A League of Their Own: "It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. It's the hard that makes it great."
Regret also changes over time. In the short run, people regret what they did, and over the long run they regret what they didn't do (Gilovich & Medvec, 1995). The parent who waits may end up regretting the year their child didn't train more than they'd ever regret the tuition.
| Moment | What to check or say |
|---|---|
| The first lesson | Agree with the family that they want to work towards Black Belt, do an amazing lesson and get the parents involved (or taking class) |
| The schedule | A solid class plan (2x a week) and the days they're coming in |
| The outcomes | What they're really buying: the confidence to excel in school and later as an adult or discipline to succeed in whatever work they decide to do in life |
| The money | Ask for the initial and first month, complete the transaction, then the agreement, with the term tied to the goal up front (about a third of the way to Black Belt or for you whatever works out to about 12 months) |
| The ask for month to month | Agree with the feeling, get the specific concern and solve the real one |
| The answer | 30 days to know, then the 30-day money-back guarantee |
| The rules | Offer the guarantee 5x minimum, with both parents there |
| Still no | "It's OK. KarateBuilt Martial Arts isn't for everybody." |
The target in our enrollment conference training is 80% of families enrolled. If the month-to-month question is costing you families, run this script in your next five conferences and count how many say yes. If you want help with it, you can always reach out to us.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/209337
Bryan, G., Karlan, D., & Nelson, S. (2010). Commitment devices. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124324
Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision making within the household. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/208639
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/209506
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102(2), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kaushal, N., & Rhodes, R. E. (2015). Exercise habit formation in new gym members: A longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9640-7
Keller, J., Kwasnicka, D., Klaiber, P., Sichert, L., Lally, P., & Fleig, L. (2021). Habit formation following routine-based versus time-based cue planning: A randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(3), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12504
Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00047.x
Worchel, S., Lee, J., & Adewole, A. (1975). Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.906